Free Domestic Shipping on orders over $100 | Exclusions apply to Sling Shafts Free Domestic Shipping on orders over $100 | Exclusions apply to Sling Shafts
Home / News / Footpocket Weight Comparison

Footpocket Weight Comparison

Jun 05, 2018 Posted by: Bradley Thornbrough

We get a lot of questions from customers asking us about the various footpockets that are available and if they will fit our Moana blades. So we are going to do a few articles about the various foot pockets that we are offering to help customers understand the differences. This article is going to cover one of the most frequently discussed topics: weight. 

We decided to grab the pockets we had in stock and compare them all in a size 9. Most foot pockets cover a range of sizes, such as 9-10 or 8-9. So we grabbed each style of pocket with a 9 in the size which should be acurate enough for this camparison. The pockets we looked at are:

Pathos Fireblade 8-1/2 - 10 (46-48)

Salvimar Step(same as Neptonics, Hammerhead, Riffe) 8-9(42-43)

C4 300

OMER Stingray 9-10(43-44)

OMER Stingray Short 9-10(43-44)

The first thing you will notice is that the sizing is all over the place. The US men's sizes don't really match up to the European sizes shown on the blades. The bottom line is that some run small and some run large. We will be posting more on that in a subsequent article. 

freediving foot pockets pathos omer short and salvimar step bottoms of pootpockets
(Bottoms. From left to right: Salvimar, OMER Stingray Short, Pathos)
The next thing that really stands out with these various products is the tendon design. The tendons are the two long protrusions that extend from the foot. They are left over vestiges from rubber and plastic fins. The tapered tendon stiffened up the soft blade material for more efficient power transfer. The tapered profile also allowed for the blades to have a stiffer base and increased flex towards the tips. In modern composite fins we can achieve fare superior characteristics by controlling the lamination schedule.  By placing carbon or glass in varying amounts and locations, we can achieve a blade that is lighter and far more efficient than a rubber or non-reinforced plastic(such as polypropylene). We will get more in-depth about fins blades in another article.
With these different manufacturers, you can see that they have different approaches to their tendon designs.  And these different tendons can actually have a major effect on blade performance as well as weight. A carbon blade with a very soft base might perform better with stiffer tendons, while those same tendons might be overkill on a blade with a stiff base.
freediving foot pockets pathos omer short and salvimar step tendon comparison
(Tendons. From left to right: Salvimar, Pathos, OMER Stingray Short, Omer Stingray) 

The MOANA hybrid blade gets its name from its design. The tip of the blade is soft and the base is stiff. This allows for a lighter kick while freediving but also gives you some backbone when you need it, such as fighting a fish or swimming in harsh conditions. This stiffer base allows for a smaller and lighter tendon. One pocket that stands out to us (and has proven to be very nice in the water) is the little-known OMER Stingray "Short".  This foot pocket has the same "shoe" as its big brother the Stingray but it has shorter and thinner tendons. Much thinner! And much lighter! This pocket actually won as the lightest rubber pocket of the group (the C4 300 was by far the lightest but it isn't rubber, it is a stiffer plastic). And the Stingray is widely known as a comfortable foot pocket. Right now this is one of my favorite pockets to pair with the Moana blades.

The Pathos pockets are only slightly heavier (less than 10 grams more which is only about a 2% increase). But don't let it's light weight fool you, the Pathos foot pocket is very stout. It actually features a stiff sole and tendons with softer uppers. This stiffness provides more efficient power transfer from the foot to the blade. The downside, and we think its a major downside, is that the foot pocket must be permanently glued to the fin blade. If you need to remove the foot pocket is must be cut off. If done carefully the blade can be reused, but the foot pocket is almost always destroyed at that point. 

 

(The four above photos show how much smaller the "short" tendons are compared to the regular stingray tendons)

To weight these various products we used out mixing scale. It is precise to 00.1 grams which is far more precision than is required for this review. 

(All weights above shown in Grams. From top to bottom: Stingray, Stingray Short, Pathos Fireblade, Salvimar style, C4 300)

 STYLE

WEIGHT(g)

OMER Stingray

656.2 

OMER Stingray short

514.1

Pathos Fireblade

524

Salvimar style(Neptonics, Hammerhead, Riffe, etc)

620.6

C4 300

322.2